Analytical Method Development And Validation For Simultaneous Estimation Of Meclizine And Caffeine In Their Tablet Dosage Form By Rp-Hplc
BHANU PRATAP SINGH *, R.P.S.RATHORE
Department of Quality Assurance , Bhupal Nobles’ College Of Pharmacy Udaipur India
Today, HPLC continues to evolve rapidly toward higher speed, efficiency, and sensitivity, driven by needs of life sciences and pharmaceutical applications. Pharmaceutical products formulated with more than one drug, typically referred to as combination products the development and validation of analytical methods. There are different modes of separation in HPLC Normal phase mod, Reversed phase mode, Ion exchange chromatography, Reverse phase ion pair chromatography, Affinity chromatography and Size exclusion chromatography. Spectrophotometric, High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) & High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)] for drug products containing more than one active ingredient. This method of analysis is gaining importance due to simple, rapid, precise, highly accurate and less time consuming The spectrophotometric analysis of drugs rarely involves the measurement of absorbance of sample containing only one absorbing component. Liquid chromatography (LC) is a physical separation technique conducted in the liquid phase. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), sometimes called high-pressure liquid chromatography. Normal phase mode of separation is therefore, not generally used for pharmaceutical applications because most of the drug molecules are polar in nature and hence take longer time to elute.
Key word: HPLC, Drug, analytical, mode of searation, chromatography, spectrophotometric.
Classical Liquid Chromatography, the term chromatography meaning “color writing,” was first discovered by Mikhail Tswett, a Russian botanist who separated plant pigments on chalk (CaCO3) packed in glass columns in 1903. Since the 1930s, chemists used gravity fed silica columns to purify organic materials and ion-exchange resin columns to separate ionic compounds and radio nuclides.In the late 1960s, Liquid Chromatography turned “high performance” with the use of small-particle columns that required high pressure pumps.
The first generation of HPLC was developed by researchers in the 1960s, including Horvath Kirkland, and Huber. Commercial development of in-line detectors and reliable injectors allowed HPLC to become a sensitive and quantitative technique leading to an explosive growth of applications. In the 1980s, the versatility and precision of HPLC rendered it virtually indispensable in pharmaceuticals as well as other diverse industries.
the emerging Today, HPLC continues to evolve rapidly toward higher speed, efficiency, and sensitivity, driven by needs of life sciences and pharmaceutical applications.
Figure 1 depicts the classical technique of Liquid Chromatography with a glass column that is packed with coarse adsorbents and gravity fed with solvents.Fractions of the eluent containing separated components are collected manually. This is contrasted with the latest computer-controlled HPLC operated at high pressure and capable of very high efficiency.
Fig.1: The traditional technique of low-pressure liquid chromatography using a glass column and gravity-fed solvent with manual fraction collection, A modern automated HPLC instrument capable of very high efficiency and pressure1.
Analytical Method Development
Pharmaceutical products formulated with more than one drug, typically referred to as combination products. These combination products can present daunting challenges to the analytical chemist responsible for the development and validation of analytical methods. Development and validation of analytical methods [Spectrophotometric, High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) & High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)] for drug products containing more than one active ingredient. The official test methods that result from these processes are used by quality control laboratories to ensure the identity, purity, potency, and performance of drug products.
The number of drugs introduced into the market is increasing every year. These drugs may be either new entities or partial structural modification of the existing ones. Very often there is a time lag from the date of introduction of a drug into the market to the date of its inclusion in pharmacopoeias. This happens because of the possible uncertainties in the continuous and wider usage of these drugs, reports of new toxicities (resulting in their withdrawal from the market), development of patient resistance and introduction of better drugs by competitors. Under these conditions, standards and analytical procedures for these drugs may not be available in the pharmacopoeias. It becomes necessary, therefore to develop newer analytical methods for such drugs [1.2.3.]
MATERIALS & METHOD
Method development and validation for estimation of Meclizine and Caffeine as active pharmaceutical ingredients and ointment dosage forms following materials are use
Table 1: Detail of instruments used
|SR. No.||Instruments||Specification and Manufaturer|
|1||Double Beam UV-Visible Spectrophotometer||VU-Visible 1700,
|2||HPLC||SPD-20AT, Shimadzu Limited|
|3||Analytical balance||AX-200, Precisa Limited|
|4||pH Meter||Chemiline, India|
|5||Ultra Sonic Cleaner||Toshcon, Toshniwal Process Instrument Pvt. Ltd., Ajmer|
Table 2: System Specification of HPLC (SPD-20AT)
|3||Column||BDS Hypersil C18, 250mm X 4.6 mm, 5µ(particle size), Thermo scientific|
|4||Injector||Rheodyne injector (20µl Capacity)|
Table 3: Detail of chemicals used
|2||Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate||AR||Merck, Rankem|
|4||Orthophosphoric Acid||AR||Merck, Rankem|
|5||Tri Ethyl Amine||AR||Merck, Rankem|
MARKET FORMULATION USED; PREGNITOXIN
In the present work a simple, accurate, rapid, specific, sensitive and selective reverse phase HPLC method was developed for simultaneous estimation of Meclizine and caffeine in their combined dosage forms and Developed Method was validated.
Mobile phase: Buffer-Methanol (70:30) pH 3.5
Column: BDS Hypersil C 18 , 250 mm X 4.6 mm, 5 µ(partical size),Thermo scientific
Injection volume : 20 ul
Column temperature: 250C
Sample temperature: 250C
Flow rate : 1 ml/min
λ max: 226 nm
Figure: 2 Pure Peaks
Buffer-Methanol (70:30) pH 3.5
Retention Time was found to be 4.227 for Meclizine and 5.413 for Caffeine.
The results of assay were found to be 100±0.64 and 100±0.25 for Meclizine and Caffeine respectively The result of assay was found close to 100%.
The linearity was observed in the range of 10-30 and 0.5-1.5 μg/ml with Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.999 for Caffeine. The linearity was observed in the range of 12.5-37.5 and 0.5-1.5 μg/ml with Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.999 for Mclizine.
The result of interday and intraday precision were found to be satisfactory within limit of % RSD 2 %
The accuracy (% recovery) was found to be 99.17-100.63 % for Caffeine and 100.59-102.29% for Meclizine .
The result of repeatability were found to be within range of % RSD 2%
. The result of robustness were found to be satisfactory within range of %RSD 2% by deliberating variation in method parameters i.e. Floe rate, Mobile Phase, pH.
Analytical methods were attempted to developed and validated for Simultaneous estimation of Meclizine and Caffeine Tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. The Trail 16 Works found to be accurate & reliable comparative to remaining trails. This trail 16 was used for Validation.A reverse phase liquid chromatography (LC) method was developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of Meclizine and Caffeine in Tablet Formulation. The isocratic LC analysis was performed on Hypersil BDS C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm ) using mobile phase composed of Buffer: Methanol pH 3.5 (70:30, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Quantitation was performed using UV detector at 226 nm. The retention times were found to be 4.2 min for Meclizine and 5.4 min for Caffeine. The analytical method was validated according to ICH guidelines The linearity was observed in the range of 10-30 and 0.5-1.5 μg/ml with Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.999 for Caffeine. The linearity was observed in the range of 12.5-37.5 and 0.5-1.5 μg/ml with Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.999 for Mclizine. The results of assay were found to be 100±0.64 and 100±0.25 for Meclizine and Caffeine respectively The result of assay was found close to 100%. The relative standard deviation values for repeatability and intermediate precision studies were less than 2%. The method was successfully applied for market sample analysis and mean percentage assay values were 99.17-100.63 % for Caffeine and 100.59-102.29% for Meclizine. The present method is precise and accurate and can be used for the routine estimation of Meclizine and Caffeine in tablet formulation.
- Dong WM. Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists; A Wiley- Inter science publication, USA, 2006: pp 1-9.
- Kazakevich Y and LoBrutto R. HPLC for pharmaceutical Scientists; A John Wiley and sons, 2007: pp 1-6.
- Snyder LR., Kirkland JJ and Glajch LJ. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography; 2nd Edn; A Wiley- Inter science publication, NY, USA, 1997: pp 5-42.
- Snyder LR., Kirkland JJ and Glajch LJ. Practical HPLC Method Development; 2nd Edn; A Wiley- Inter science publication, NY, USA, 1997: pp 3-35.
- Skoog DA., Holler FJ and Nieman TA. Introduction to UV Spectroscopy, Principle of instrumental analysis; 5th Edn; Thomson Brooks/Cole publication, 2005: pp 301.
- Beckett AH and Stenlake JB. UV-visible Spectrophotometry: Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry; 4th Edn; Part-II, C.B.S. Publishers, Delhi, 2001: 275-299.
- FDA, “Guidance for Industry; Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation (Draft guidance), Food & Drug Administration,” Rockville, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000.
- ICH, Validation of Analytical Procedures; Methodology, Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization, IFPMA, Geneva 1996.
- Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology; 5th Edn; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi, 2004: pp 612-621, 867-878.
- Indian Pharmacopoeia, THE INDIAN PHARMACOPOEIA COMMISSION GHAZIABAD,1638-1639, 150-151
- Shantilal P Padhiyar, Shreyas V Bhavsar. RP-HPLC Method “Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Meclizine and Folic Acid in their Combined Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Inventi Rapid: Pharm Analysis & Quality Assurance”, 2016; (3):1-7, 2016.
- Gandhi Santosh V., Mittal Prashant S., Gaikwad Ashwini M., “Development and validation of stability indicating rp-hplc method for simultaneous estimation of beclomethasone dipropionate and salbutamol sulphate”, International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015;7(6) :252-257
- Gavitre Sangita B., Dr. Pingle Ashok P., Kale Nanasaheb R., Mirza Javed A., “World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences”, 2014; 3(8)2193-2206.
- Anuradha Y., Rao Venkateswara P., Thangabalan B., “Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Mupirocin and Metronidazole in Combined Dosage Form by rp-hplc”, World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2014; 4: (7)2001.
- Parmar Arti P., Dr. Maheshwari Dilip G., “Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Mupirocin and Mometasone Furoate in Topical Formulation by rp-hplc”, International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research (IJPSR), 2015; 6: 758-766.
- Ahmed M., Hussain W.A., Qadir M.A., tahir M.S., “Development and Validation of New HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of L-Lysine Hydrochloride and L-Carnitine-L-Tartrate in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form”, Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,2015; 77(4): 434-438.
- Kumar Vinod K., Sudhakar M., Reddy Padmanabha Y., Malleshwari P., Hafeez S.K., “RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Lopinavir and Ritonavir in Dosage form and in Plasma”, International Journal of Pharma Research & Review, 2014; 3(9): 1-8.
- Dhudashia, Komal R., Patel Amit V., Patel, Chhaganbhai N., “Development and validation of a reversed-phase HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of clotrimazole and beclomethasone dipropionate in lotion and cream dosage form”, Chronicles of Young Scientists, 2013; 4(2): p 102.
- Ginjupalli Kishore, Armugam Karthik, Shavi Venkat Gopal, Averineni Ranjith Kumar, Mahalingam Bhat, Udupa N., “Development of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of lactic acid and glycolic acid”, Der Pharma Chemica, 2013; 5(4): p 335-340.
- Useni Reddy Mallul K., Hussain Reddy, Varaprasad Bobbarala, Somesekhar Penumajji, “Determination of beclomethasone dipropionate, clotrimazole, chloramphenicol and lidocaine in pharmaceutical formulations using a novel rp-hplc method”, International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 2011; 2(3): 453-462.
- Rao Lakshmana A., Raju Bhaskara V., “Development and Validation of New HPLC Method for The Estimation of Perindopril in Tablet Dosage Forms”, Rasayan Journal Of chemistry, 2011; 4(1): 113-116.
- Saravanan J., Shajan A., Joshi N.H., Varatharajan R., Valliappan K., “A Simple and validated RP-HPLC method for the estimation of methylcobalamin in bulk and capsule dosage form”, International Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2010; 1(2): 13-16.